SOL 2 (2016) – making decisions
Today started the first day of ShortCourse – a weeklong “summer camp for BC Principals and Vice Principals. We got to meet our table-team (the soccer fanatics for our table).
We started out with a discussion introducing ourselves and thinking about: why are we here (both in the role of pvp and here at shortcourse) One of our key goals is thinking about our thinking – and to help with this we were led through a session around Ethical Decision Making – because so many of our decisions for ourselves, for our schools, for our districts are very complex and have answers that may change depending on the day…..
Liz Bell & Adam Baumann gave us a great reminder of ethical decision making and different levels of values:
Level one: pre-conventional morality: punishment/reward (what’s in it for me?)
Level two: conventional morality: perception/authority (what will others think?)
Level three: social contract/authority (what will I think)
None of these are based on age, but acknowledges that people are at all levels depending on what the issue is….(ie speeding….)
Group Question: What is the evidence at your school pointing to? And stages have nothing (okay – a little) with age.
Some key reminder around Ethical Fitness:
- Sustain moral responsibilities and principles
- Mentally engaged in decision making
- Caring enough to want “right” to prevail
Group Question: Name the values you have (yourself as well as the learning community)
Morals have to do with right and wrong behaviour
Ethics pertain to the study of standards between and wrong behaviour
Ethical decision making:
Obedience to the unenforceable – because it’s the right thing to do
Obedience to the enforceable – because it’s the law
Testing for right-vs-wrong
- the legal test
- The professional standards test
- The gut feeling test
- The front-page test
- The role model test
Right vs right dilemma paradigms
Truth vs loyalty
individual vs community
short term vs long term
justice vs mercy
Ends-Based: utilitarianism (the greatest good for the greatest number)
Rules-Based: Categorical Imperative (I ought never to act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law – Kant)
Care-Based: Golden Rule (do to others as you would have them do to you)
Highlight of using process/model: it sometimes slows things down so that you are making a mindful decision.
It is not about everyone liking your decision.
It is about people trusting that you have a process.
It is being able to articulate what your decision is and how you got to it.
It is about your values that consistently underlie your decision.
It is about listening to others, collaborating and revisiting if necessary.